An Oxford comma, also known as a serial comma, is a comma used before the conjunction in a list of three or more items. The purpose of the Oxford comma is to clarify the meaning of a sentence by separating items in a list and avoiding ambiguity.
For example, consider the following sentence without an Oxford comma:
Without an Oxford comma, it is unclear whether the speaker had lunch with four people (their parents, Beyoncé, and Lady Gaga) or whether the speaker had lunch with only their parents, and separately mentioned that they had also met Beyoncé and Lady Gaga at a different time.
However, with an Oxford comma, the sentence would read:
In this sentence, the Oxford comma makes it clear that the speaker had lunch with three people: their parents, Beyoncé, and Lady Gaga.
Here are five additional examples that demonstrate the use of the Oxford comma:
Despite its clear benefits in avoiding ambiguity, the use of the Oxford comma is a source of disagreement among writers. Some argue that the Oxford comma is unnecessary and can make sentences look cluttered, while others believe that it is essential for clarity. Ultimately, the decision to use an Oxford comma is a matter of personal preference and style.
Grammar can be a tricky subject, and one common issue that arises is the use of dangling modifiers. Dangling modifiers can create confusion and ambiguity in a sentence, but are they really a big deal? In this blog post, we'll define what a dangling modifier is, discuss why it can be a problem, and offer some tips for avoiding them.
What is a Dangling Modifier?
A dangling modifier is a type of misplaced modifier that is not clearly or logically connected to the subject of a sentence. In other words, the modifier "dangles" without a clear referent in the sentence. This can result in confusing or even unintentionally humorous sentences.
Here's an example of a dangling modifier:
Walking through the park, the flowers were beautiful.
In this sentence, the modifier "walking through the park" is not clearly connected to a subject. Who or what is walking through the park? The sentence implies that it's the flowers, which is obviously not correct.
Why Dangling Modifiers Can Be a Big Deal
Dangling modifiers can cause confusion or ambiguity in a sentence, which can make it difficult for readers to understand the intended meaning. They can also create unintentional humor, which may not be appropriate in all situations. In addition, using too many dangling modifiers can make writing seem unprofessional or sloppy.
Here are some reasons why dangling modifiers can be problematic:
They can change the meaning of a sentence. Dangling modifiers can lead to sentences that say something unintended or different than what was intended.
They can confuse readers. Dangling modifiers can make it difficult for readers to understand what the writer is trying to say.
They can make writing seem unprofessional. Using too many dangling modifiers can make writing seem unpolished or careless.
How to Avoid Dangling Modifiers
Fortunately, there are some easy ways to avoid dangling modifiers. Here are a few tips:
Make sure the subject is clear. A modifier should be clearly connected to the subject of the sentence.
Place the modifier close to the subject. When possible, place the modifier right next to the subject it's modifying.
Rewrite the sentence. If you can't fix a dangling modifier by simply moving it closer to the subject, try rewriting the sentence.
Here's an example of a corrected sentence:
Walking through the park, I saw beautiful flowers.
In this sentence, the subject ("I") is clearly connected to the modifier "walking through the park." The sentence now makes sense and is free of dangling modifiers.
While dangling modifiers may seem like a minor issue in grammar, they can cause confusion and ambiguity in writing. They can also make writing seem unprofessional or sloppy. However, with some careful attention and editing, it's easy to avoid dangling modifiers and create clear, concise, and effective writing.
“I am one of those many fools who paid a huge amount of money for a useless course. This book... has opened so many doors for me. I now look on Mike as my mentor as I embark on a career. Thank you Mike.”
Emma Steel, Proofreader and International Structural Editor.
“ I thoroughly enjoyed the course and am so glad that I decided to take it... the whole experience was invaluable. My proofreading service is now well established and your course played no small part in getting it off the ground.”
Hache L. Jones, Proofreader.
“I'd just like to thank you first of all for writing such a great, straight forward eBook, and then going above and beyond what I would even expect as a customer by providing us, completely free of charge, updated versions months later!”
Rachel Gee, Trainee Proofreader.
“What can I say? Worth every penny and then some! God Bless! This a fabulous course.”
Teresa Richardson, Proofreader.
“As someone who has effectively been proofreading for thirty years, I found Mike’s No-Nonsense Proofreading Course an invaluable introduction and a very useful practical guide to many aspects of this discipline. I can wholeheartedly recommend it as the ideal starting point, and much more besides.”
Jeremy Meehan, Proofreader.
My name's Mike Sellars and I'm an experienced proofreader and the author of The No-Nonsense Proofreading Course. Click here to find out more about me.
The No-Nonsense Proofreading Course
A Fraction of the Cost of Other Proofreading Courses
NOTE: Stock is currently limited to 10 per day, so we can continue to deliver exceptional after-sales service, answer queries and provide open-door support.
Credit card and PayPal payments accepted.
“As someone who has been proofreading for 30 years, I found Mike’s course an invaluable introduction and a very useful practical guide to many aspects of the discipline. I can wholeheartedly recommend it.” Jeremy Meehan, Proofreader.
Still want to find out more? Click here.